The number of instances, their properties and how long you use them. This includes your operating system, which images you use, The Multipass developers, by sending anonymous usage data? One quick question before we launch … Would you like to help I’m getting this issue when trying to build a package: $ multipass launch I ensure that multipass can be launched formally under the host, however, the snapcraft cleanbuild always failed to trigger the multipass/lxd. Stopping local:snapcraft-loudly-fresh-moleĪn error occurred when trying to copy files using 'lxd': returned exit code 1 Modprobe: FATAL: Module msr not found in directory /lib/modules/4.15.0-1030-oemĪn error occurred when trying to launch the instance with 'multipass': returned exit code 2.Įnsure that 'multipass' is setup correctly and try again. libkmod/libkmod.c:586 kmod_search_moddep() could not open moddep file '/lib/modules/4.15.0-1030-oem/' Multipass (beta) 2018.12.1 from Canonical✓ installedĬhannel latest/beta for multipass is closed temporarily forwarding to beta. ![]() Snapd is not logged in, snap install commands will use sudo You need multipass installed to build snaps which use the base keyword. I also encountered the similar the issue when I used snapcraft to create a uc18 gadget for arm64: $ snapcraft cleanbuild -target-arch=arm64 If that’s really the motivation, couldn’t the same build environment be provided as a container for Linux systems and as a VM image on Mac? For snapcraft maintainers, doesn’t it ultimately come down to maintaining a tarball that can be extracted either in a container or on a virtual disk?Īnd second, I don’t know if I’m the only one who thinks this, but is it fair and reasonable to annoy Linux developers in order to facilitate support of a proprietary, closed source platform that many Linux users frankly don’t give a flick about, to put it mildly? Now with multipass, builds are slow, there is no possibility to just hack and try some stuff in a half-working snap to work it out, and it generally goes backwards in terms of user friendliness. With the previous approach it was very convenient to keep a “prime” directory, possibly mounted into a build container, that could be mounted as a snap through “snap try”, and work iteratively in it until all necessary adjustments were made and integrated into snapcraft.yaml. multipassd: Failed to open module: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qemu/block-iscsi.so: undefined symbol: scsi_sense_to_errnoįailed to open module: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qemu/block-curl.so: undefined symbol: qdict_put_strįailed to open module: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qemu/block-rbd.so: undefined symbol: As I see it, this causes a regression for package maintainers. multipassd: process state changed to Running **strong text** multipassd: process state changed to Starting multipassd: process arguments '-enable-kvm, -hda, /var/snap/multipass/common/data/multipassd/vault/instances/meticulous-gryphon/ubuntu-18.04-server- cloudimg-amd64.img, -drive, file=/var/snap/multipass/common/data/multipassd/vault/instances/meticulous-gryphon/cloud-init-config.iso,if=virtio,format=raw, -smp, 1, -m, 1G, -device, virtio-net-pci,netdev=hostnet0,id=net0,mac=52:54:00:f2:35:28, -netdev, tap,id=hostnet0,ifname=tap-d0287099bf7,script=no,downscript=no, -qmp, stdio, -chardev, null,id=char0, -serial, chardev:char0, -nographic' multipassd: process program 'qemu-system-x86_64' multipassd: QIODevice::write (QFile, "/var/snap/multipass/common /cache/multipassd/vault/multipassd-image-records.json"): device not open multipassd: gRPC listening on unix:/run/multipass_socket, SSL:on multipassd: Incompatible version of OpenSSL ![]() multipassd: QSslSocket: cannot resolve OpenSSL_version ![]() multipassd: QSslSocket: cannot resolve OpenSSL_version_num multipassd: QSslSocket: cannot resolve X509_get_version multipassd: QSslSocket: cannot resolve X509_getm_notAfter ![]() Hanging forever… $ snap logs -f multipass
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |